I plan on writing a book or two within the next 18 months, and if no one else will publish them, I�ll have to end up self-publishing. It�s out of this desire to be the person who precipitates change, to be one of the ones who is responsible for the way the world turns out in the next century.
Some of my friends who were most idealistic and most desirous of change when I was younger have retreated into quietly contented lives, many of them buying into the �well, everyone changes the world in some way� philosophy that many movies and television shows espouse. While thinking this is true in a literal sense, most people can see that it isn�t true in a more realistic one. Unless they just happen to be the person who unwittingly prevents the death of a world leader or some equally strange circumstance, the vast majority of people change very little in the world around them. So while I do not begrudge these friends their lives � I can understand that drive for contentedness � I also choose not to take their path.
However, in the past few months, I have found someone who takes it to the other end of the spectrum. A friend of mine, we�ll call him H, wants to change the world at the expense of all else. He�s twenty-eight years old. He�s still a virgin. He�s never even been kissed. And what�s more, he�s not sure he wants to change that � he�s worried that a romance could detract from what he�s trying to accomplish.
And what, precisely, is he trying to do? Well, he wants for humanity to live forever. Clinical immortality, that�s his Big Thing. In his opinion, this can happen within the next 150 years if science keeps progressing at current rates, but that even a 1% slowdown in technology (because of compounding, like interest at a bank) could slow down Immortality Day by decades. And he�s afraid.
So he works solely for his cause, but working solely for the cause is what is slowing him down. People need love, they need touch and romance and good friendships. He refuses to love, feels guilty about even starting. He�s afraid of touch, especially that of women. And he only makes friends with those he considers valuable to the cause. This would cause anyone to become neurotic, and H is no exception. He�s stuck in these constant states of anguish over what he should do next that will further his cause the most. He never takes the time to realize that the time he spends agonizing over minutiae is wasted and would be better spent just deciding.
He�s unhappy. He�s lonely. But he has his cause. Is that enough? I don�t think so. Maybe the most compelling evidence for that is in the fact that if somehow he made it to Immortality Day, if his dreams became reality, he doesn�t know what he�d do. All he has is his cause. For him, there is absolutely nothing else. If his goals were achieved, he has no relationships that are important, no other dreams. He works tirelessly to achieve his purpose, never realizing that what he is doing could well make him purposeless.
I don�t see the point. �Purity� doesn�t help one get where one wants to be, unless one is considering being a monk. I�m an experience-oriented person, and while I have a cause (though it�s a bit different and more narrowly tailored than most), I do not stop living my life for it. At one point, I almost wanted to. And H showed me, through example, why I do not want to become that, why I can�t. I still have purpose, still have direction and goals. But I refuse to kill the things that are best within me for those purposes, I refuse to give up the rest of my life. I refuse to stop living.
To all you would-be ideologues and activists, remember: there are more important things than changing the world.
