<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncouth Perspectives &#187; commercialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncouth.net/tag/commercialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncouth.net</link>
	<description>Not on the rug, man.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>You are teh best EVAR&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.uncouth.net/2008/02/21/you-are-teh-best-evar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uncouth.net/2008/02/21/you-are-teh-best-evar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncouth.net/life/395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like giving gifts.
I do not like giving them on prescribed days.
At least, I do not like giving them on prescribed days for the sheer sake of the day.  There is the obvious reason&#8211;the gross commercialism.  Do I really need to rehash that obvious and tired (though not any less true) argument?  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like giving gifts.</p>
<p>I do not like giving them on prescribed days.</p>
<p>At least, I do not like giving them on prescribed days for the sheer sake of the day.  There is the obvious reason&#8211;the gross commercialism.  Do I really need to rehash that obvious and tired (though not any less true) argument?  There&#8217;s also something kind of dirty about the expectation.  It is one thing for a person to know they are getting a gift and being excited.  But it&#8217;s an entirely different thing when someone assumes, if not demands, a gift for no good reason but tradition says to do it&#8211;and it goes from dirty to disgusting if they get mad when you do not give them something.</p>
<p>But, now, giving a gift because you <em>want</em> to give a gift.  That&#8217;s awesome.  Or giving a gift because someone has done something and you want to tell them thanks, or how much you appreciate it, or whatever, that is cool.  Or telling someone you&#8217;ve gotten them a gift and watching them squirm with anticipation&#8230; priceless.</p>
<p>I have talked about this before, but one of the things I do not understand is the idea that if someone gives you a gift, you must reciprocate.  There is this kind of spiral of guilt that can begin with a single gift.  In my EVER so humble opinion, real gifts do not <em>require</em> reciprocation.  If the receiver wants to reciprocate, have a blast.  But, again, it&#8217;s the expectation where things become problematic.</p>
<p>Although, I can imagine that if I wanted to create waves of havoc, I could start a gift reciprocation circle of DOOM.  Here&#8217;s how it works.  I give three or four people small trinkets.  They respond with something better because, obviously, if you&#8217;re going to reciprocate, you must also better the person (nothing like a competition when giving gifts).  Then I take the gifts I get back and give them to the other people.  Maybe find three or four other people to give small gifts too.  Then I just keep swapping back and forth until someone gives me a private island with a lemur and a turtle on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uncouth.net/2008/02/21/you-are-teh-best-evar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
